Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Voyager Optimus Prime Video Review

Peaugh and co is back, this time with a video review of Voyager class Optimus Prime from the Transformers 2 toy line. It is essentially a repaint of Prime from the first movie with an improved paint job. Also a more pictures of the Fallen toy have popped up online and can be seen here. Thanks to Hugo for the link.

22 comments:

  1. Can someone answer this question for me - how come there are toys of almost all the characters in the film except the constructicons? If devastator was in the movie we would be seeing other constructicon toy figures but we haven't. I have the feeling demolishor is the only one we will see.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to say that this guy does a GREAT job with the toy reviews--Keep up the good work!

    Oh-----third!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. OOPS---it was fouth!!

    P.S. All 6 Constructicons will have a robot mode toy and the ones that don't have a robot mode combine into Supreme Devastator

    1, 2, 3, 4, FIF

    ReplyDelete
  4. If that was true we would have seen a figure by now. We've seen the megatron figure and we haven't seem him in any previews. The megatron figure is the first we've seen of him. They even have the fallen toy out already.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ^^^

    Rampage, Demolishor, and Long Haul have robot mode toys already. It is highly unlikely that DW/Paramount would want to ruin the film so early.

    The reason we saw Megs & the Fallen toys so early was on purpose b/c of the trailer w/F the 13th{they were in it}

    ReplyDelete
  6. We did see those toys already? I missed them.
    Megatron wasn't in the trailer at all.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So far it's Voyager Demol.//DLX Rampage//FAB Long Haul.

    The hand holding down Sam in the trailer is....

    SPOILER ALERT!!!!!

    Definitely that of MEGS

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi everybody anyone know when they are reviewing leader prime?

    Anyway i have a competition inspired by Josh nizzi`s artwork for more details and rules go to the following link (10th post down):

    http://transformerslive.blogspot.com/2009/02/deluxe-jetfire-long-haul-and-others.html

    Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Definitely that of MEGS

    No, not definitly :P

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yea I didn't think that was megatron. Starscream or who?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Granted it's not 100%, but I think the consensus is that IS Megatron's hand holding down Sam, you can even see the tank treads on the leg in the background, and no one else has a hand quite like that with the long inconsistent fingers.

    They inserted Starscream's model on the chase scene right before it to throw people off. I've seen them do that before, where they have a CG animatic of a character and they'll put in another character model in the trailer so they aren't revealing something that they want to keep secret.

    ReplyDelete
  12. HAS ANYONE NOTICED THAT THE FALLEN'S FACE LOOKS LIKE THE DECEPTICON LOGO? I JUST NOTICED THAT IN THESE NEW CLOSE UP SHOTS.

    ReplyDelete
  13. to the above,
    well done give yourself a pat on the back

    ReplyDelete
  14. HAS ANYONE noticed that you never see Prime and that red blue semi at the same time? i'm beginning to think they are the same person.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "HAS ANYONE noticed that you never see Prime and that red blue semi at the same time? i'm beginning to think they are the same person."

    I laughed so hard at that. Kudos to you :P

    I'm finding the Constructicons to be a very interesting bunch.

    Demolisher/Scavenger has the uni-wheel thing going on (with a second wheel at times)

    Rampage seems to have what appears to be a spider-esque way of moving because as far as I can tell on the toy he has four legs.

    Long Haul... well... he didn't really have anything special about his legs or anything, but the other three might have weird legs too. *Shrug* We'll see

    ReplyDelete
  16. Why does Long Haul have a pilot/cow catcher on his front bumper??

    ReplyDelete
  17. simple, Long Haul wouldn't be able to stand in robot mode without it :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. I see......

    ReplyDelete

 
               
               Creative Commons License