Another day, another update on the Sector 7 site. They are starting to speed things up it seems.
The email:
From: Restricted
Subject: RE: Agent SU Information
Date Recieved: Apr. 6 2007 11:34 (MST)
To: S7 Department of Network Security
I received your forwarded message from Agent SU about X's recent activity to blow the lid off our cover on this public site. First Howard escapes, now this. Powers is really getting on my nerves. I don't care whose nephew he is. If he doesn't capture or neutralize Agent X ASAP, he's toast.
With regard to this web site buzznet.com/groups/stopsectorseven, we need to send our agents there to question and discredit every piece of evidence they find. Put out the word. X must be stopped one way or the other. Especially considering the reports I'm getting regarding Operation: Seek & Destroy.
Simmons
P.S. Let me know the second Power screws up again.
So Powers in trouble. Next mistake gets replaced (maybe occur when days lab safe goes to 0?). No idea who Agent SU is nor Simmons. Curious what Operation: Seek & Destroy is. Perhaps directly related to the Sector 7 presence in the movie. The mystery continues...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You know, this is the first movie character I have seen so far in this Sector Seven site. Agent Simmons is to be the Agent in the movie, the one in the scene shown as that Toy Fair event, when he takes Sam and Mikaela in for questioning.
ReplyDeletealso the video of Howard was moved to the left one and there's a new one in the hazard spot
ReplyDeleteThere's a character in the prequel novel named Simmons. From what we can infer from the book - he's got a lot of power in Sector Seven - one of the most powerful people, but not it's ultimate master.
ReplyDeleteThat is, assuming it's the same Simmons. He's a fairly old guy in the book, and that takes place some time before the year 2007 :P.
Just noticed something about the site (don't know if anyone else noticed it)...my comp had some lag while loading the security camera for the lab (?) area, and for a split second the day count (# of days since there's been an accident) was blank...which means that there's some program that controls that count and puts it up. Which would explain why we never see anyone change the number...
ReplyDelete