IESB: On Transformers it's a bit different on the writing process because you've got Ehren [Kruger] working as well. How did that work out for you guys?Note that while the interviewer mentioned specific TF characters that are unconfirmed to be in the movie, the writers skipped right past it without confirming or denying them.
Bob: We couldn't have done it without Ehren. It would have literally been impossible because we were producing Eagle Eye...
Alex: And with the strike, it really ran out the clock so when the strike ended, we had four months to get a shooting draft together. And so the three of us locked ourselves into a hotel, or I should say, Michael Bay locked us in a hotel... We would work in one room, Ehren in another room and then we'd get together twice a day and trade pages and go over each other's stuff. It was actually great, it was a lot of fun and having him come in with a fresh perspective and not having had any of the baggage we had from the first movie was key to making the second one it's own movie, distinct from the first one.
Bob: And Ehren's the greatest too because he's equal parts fan boy and grown-up and I think he is able to get the best of both perspectives and so it was just a very fun team and it felt, we worked together on a movie he had written for us as producers, but this was the first time to really sit down and write together and I think it was the easiest transition I can imagine.
IESB: Real quickly on Transformers, it looks like it's definite that the Constructicons and Devastator are in, Soundwave is in, can you give us any hints, any clues of what else we are going to see?
Bob: You are going to find out a lot about the mythology. It's officially going to tell you what the Transformers history is and I think a lot of it is going to be taken, somewhat, from gospel. I think we all settled on the fact that the source material and the myth that established in much of the Transformers back story was perfect for this movie. And that should be satisfying to genuine fans.
IESB: One of the things that we got teased about, and that I loved, was looking at Cybertron. Are we going to actually see it this time? Are we getting the same - explain it in the beginning of the movie and then back to Earth?
Alex: I think in the spirit of what we gave you in the first movie, there will be similar things in this movie.
Bob: Meaning, "no comment." (laughter)
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Orci: "Lot about the mythology"
IESB.net interviewed Transformers' writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman as the promoted Eagle Eye that is coming out September 26th. They briefly discuss writing Transformers and plans for the story (but no details of course).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
So basically, we got no new information from this interview. :)
ReplyDeleteDidn't Bay once said he don't want to use TF mythology in his film... No, f*** it, i will just wait till i see film, cause this paranoia situation is killing me xP
ReplyDeletelol yeah man, they just skipped past the soundwave and devastator questions. haha
ReplyDeleteBob and Alex have become quite good at skirting around subjects. I guess when you are interviewed a lot it's going to happen.
ReplyDeleteIf I got paid as much as these fellas are, I would keep my mouth shut too.
ReplyDeleteFrom the way ALEX KURTZMAN answers, I would say Cybertron is in it for the scenes of the Decepticons talking to Starscream and making the decision to strike attack Earth for their REVENGE. Plus some other small parts. So we do get to see it, just not alot. Hench half the reason we see no Decepticon Vehicles. Just big destructive explosions and people running for their lives. Their must be ALOT OF CGI in this movie.
ReplyDelete10 DECEPTICONS and we've only seen 4 so far. RUMBLE (Frenzy look-a-like), AUDI R8, JETFIRE, and miniture model of a F-22, being STARSCREAM of course.
wait i though Jetfire was a autobot, wasn't he?
ReplyDeleteWut about Long Haul....i'm 90% shore he's in the movie....and maybe Megatron will be resurected...u never know....plus wuts a transformer movie without Megs beating the crap out of everyone and still manage to loose :P
ZOMG, WTF, STFU, THE FALLEN IS CONFIRMED!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-news/transformers-movie-9/transformers-2--the-fallen-confirmed-to-be-a-new-character-165813/
(FANBOYS WETS THEMSELFS)
How is that confirmation? Just becuase another fan site says its happening doesn't mean its true. It doesn't lead to a link where someone that works on the movie confirms it or anything, just another rumor as far as im concerned.
ReplyDeleteThe title still wouldn't make sense "Revenge of the Fallen".....if the Fallen is referring to a character, what would he be getting revenge for? Since he wasn't in the first movie it makes no sense.
Lorenzo di Bonaventura interview on IESB.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5488&Itemid=99
"How is that confirmation? Just becuase another fan site says its happening doesn't mean its true. "
ReplyDeleteSTFU u nOOb, TFW 2005 is da gratest SITE IN THE HOLE net! They know, like, EVERYTHING!
I have to agree with the post three above mine: another fan site saying "The Fallen" refers to the character from the comics does not make it true. The only confirmation TFW2005 offers us is their "TF2 Insider." We don't know who that person is or if the information they're giving out is legit. Until we see a toy design, concept art, a leaked script, a trailer, or confirmation from Bay, Orci, or Kurtzman, the speculation regarding what "the fallen" refers to is just that - speculation.
ReplyDeleteAnd please don't interpret this as some attack on the other fan site. I'd just like to see some evidence to back up their claims.